Comments on: First effects of coming changes in eroge

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:37:23 +0000

I consider this rather pointless because in the world we live in today its all about the money. A company could have bribed the politicians into sticking their noses into this to gain profit someway somehow or some idiot politician thinks he/she can gain support by ’stepping it up’ in issues like this. Its rather simple really. Fact is females hold a higher majority to males and things like these mean gaining the support of the majority. End of the day it all leads to filling one person’s pocket at the expense of almost everyone else.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:39:44 +0000

“Is there anyone else who’s eerily reminded of the 1950’s Comics Code in the US?”
how old are you?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:35:48 +0000

Is there anyone else who’s eerily reminded of the 1950’s Comics Code in the US?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:29:04 +0000

another Anonymous than this one:
“Or like in Hitman, and The Punisher, where the game encourages players to be as brutal with their victims as possible.”
You have obviously never played Hitman.

And as long as films (live action, no less) glorifying this subject are around (and apparently loved) I laugh at anyone tring to ban it in videogames.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:14:42 +0000

How the hell do rape games promote rape while murder games don’t promote murder?

Look at Munhunt 1 and 2. Postal 1 and 2. Chiller. Carmageddon. True Crime: New York City. Hitman: Blood Money. Grand Theft Auto.

You get EXTRA POINTS by torturing to death innocent people, women and children included. Beating the crap out of innocent bystanders is not only allowed, but is encouraged.
And if you’re creative and pour gasoline on a woman and light her up, like in Postal 2, you get even higher score.
Or like in Hitman, and The Punisher, where the game encourages players to be as brutal with their victims as possible. And one can say the latter’s plot encourages people to take the law in their hands and go kill those who have wrong them.
And so many more.

I almost never play such games. And yet I don’t start a crusade against them!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:10:27 +0000

Game that is banned: Rapeplay.
It has a dude raping women.
Clearly, it inspires rape.

Game that is legal: Postal2.
This is your run-of-the-mill shoot ‘em up game that lets you pick on and shoot innocent bystanders, decapitate them, light them on fire with gasoline, and even throw an anthrax-filled cow’s head at them. The results of the anthrax will make them vomit blood. Still want more? You’ll want to shoot people quietly, of course. So there’s a silencer in the game - a live cat. Well, it’s live when you start. You stick the gun up the cat’s butt and the gun is muffled, but every time you shoot, the cat cries out in pain. Eventually the cat will die and fly off of the gun.

Clearly, it inspires murder and torture. But it’s okay! It has no rape.

By: Jibaro

Jibaro — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:53:29 +0000

Jibaro - Did you actually read my comment, or did the word ‘feminist’ short-circuit your brain?

I said that some people think homosexuality is icky and would want to ban all games containing it. THESE PEOPLE ARE CLEARLY IDIOTS. “Some people think it’s icky” is not a good reason to ban something, because the “some people” in question might be bigoted morons.

“Some people think it’s icky” is not sufficient reason to ban gay content, or fantasy rape content, or Porn Clowns content, or…

…oh sorryy, never caught that, I’m such a dumass heehee

By: PornLovingFeminist

PornLovingFeminist — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 20:06:44 +0000

Jibaro - Did you actually read my comment, or did the word ‘feminist’ short-circuit your brain?

“Some people think it’s icky” is not sufficient reason to ban gay content, or fantasy rape content, or Porn Clowns content, or…

By: prude duude

prude duude — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:50:23 +0000

more tentacle rape?….this is sick man!…….i quit this joint i rather get drunk with beer!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 06:31:32 +0000

I find the idea disgusting, doesn’t mean I’m pro-ban. It’s a freedom-of-speech thing. Plus, it’s not real. As a wiser man than me once said: “I may not agree with your ideas, but I’ll die defending your right to have them.”